Basic Physics review
Remember the first observations of 'Black' holes? All reported to move towards earth.
Remember the first results from the particle-accelerator in Cern? 'Dark' matter observed.
How come scientists were fired and results suddenly changed?
"When a Black Hole has absorbed an exceeding amount of nucleus free deep space bacteria compared to the weight of its own nucleus mass - it will implode on itself." - quote Jesper Hjulmand Joergensen.
Most people believe that the universe was created by one or several big explosions or collapse of mass. If so, there would have been an disharmony of any original mass structure,- and if so, there is no precise center of the universe.
If we observe Black Holes, we observe a variable speed of light.
As we consider that light travels at the same speed as electrons orbiting nucleus and heat and mass dictates or is being dictated by the speed of the electron, light-speed would be a variable as different temperatures and mass-structures exists.
There is no such thing as light-speed, only the average speed of electrons.
The speed of light observed is determined by the average distance an electron have to travel and accelerate to meet up with an atom - and by the interaction with other nucleus.
Some scientists claim that light is bend around planets, making them hard to observe in faraway solar systems. This also indicates that light-speed is a variable.
If matter was thrown by forceful explosions and collapses in various directions and speeds from anywhere in space,- mass from 2 separate explosions- each traveling at f.ex. 2/3 of the speed of light,- would meet or pass each other at 1 1/3 of the speed of light. This will happen no matter where You are situated.
This all tells us travel beyond the `speed of light` is possible.
This also explains why we cannot see app. 90 % of the universe. Dark matter is matter moving away from us above the average speed of light.
'Black' holes are greater matter, moving lesser matter towards its center - in excess of the average speed of light.
We know from particle-accelerators that electrons probably accelerate above the speed of light to find a partner(turning into dark matter). -But as the electronic equipment used to measure the particle-speed is naturally calibrated to the speed of electrons (average light-speed) the conservative will dismiss any findings as inconclusive.
If you - as the conservative do - think like Einstein did with the Modern Cosmological argument or whatever derived like f.ex. the Theory of Relativity - You are claiming that travel beyond the speed of light is impossible - and You would know that the theory only works if You place the observer as a factor - precisely in the middle of 2 objects - in the equation?!?
-Just read the Relativity Theory and other related material and You will realize that is also based on one result from 2 different problems ?!?
The 'Relativity Theory' is based on conjecture!
-I think drawing one singular conclusion from several different problems from a fixed position as they do is a insult to Your intelligence.
-And why would You need to be the center of the universe to make a theory?
I think it is safe to say no one is.
- Einstein would think he was the center of the universe, having a laugh, keeping his friends in business.
- A lot of sci-fi geeks must love the thought of toying with 'quantum' theories and teleportation and time-travel and wormholes and I can not list all the waste of time and money here, excuse me.
- Remember the antiquated rules that led our forefathers to believe that we could not travel beyond the speed of sound?
They were proved wrong as well.
If an electron is out looking for a match, it will accelerate until it meets its target. It will surpass the `speed of light`. This movement will shift gravity and by that effect the stable atoms, and the atom it joins up with reacts.
-o-
I Include links to other blogs of mine:
http://pokeapunk.blogspot.com/
http://humor4u2.blogspot.com/
http://politics4u2.blogspot.com/
